No proposal. No term. No implementation phase.

Platforms aimed at high-ticket aesthetics tend to organise themselves around converting a consultation. Leads, nurture sequences, financing applications, coordinator dashboards. For a practice where a coordinator works that pipeline daily, it is the right shape and the price follows the revenue it influences.

A lot of clinics buy that shape and never use it. If the person doing consults is the same person holding the syringe, there is no pipeline to work, and the modules sit there raising the invoice.

Zdrovia starts from what happens in the room. Charts are assembled from structured fields rather than text boxes, so units by site, device settings, Fitzpatrick type and anything you author yourself are stored as values. Values graph, so a treatment series turns into something you can show a patient on screen.

The AI scribe listens during the appointment and writes into those fields. Dictating the note and capturing the data collapse into one job, and the structured-capture rate goes up simply because it takes no extra effort.

Inventory tracks lots, expiry, oldest-first dispensing and quarantine, with each dispense tied to a visit and an invoice line. That gives you vial-level traceability for recalls and, more usefully week to week, warnings before expensive product expires.

Quoted pricing and term agreements are normal in this part of the market and they are not a scandal. They do make evaluation slow, and they put the decision before the evidence.

Ours runs the other way. The price is published, the plan is month to month, and the free tier is the whole product rather than a preview. Run a month of real patients through it and decide afterwards. Your Stripe account stays yours either way, so leaving costs you nothing but the time you spent.